Allison Bricker

Old Thinker News recently reported on a research program originally announced by the Council on Foreign Relations last year outlining the process how best to implement a global government. The report entitled, “International Institutions and Global Governance Program: World Order in the 21st Century” outlines the five-year research agenda, made possible by a grant from “The Robina Foundation”, to modernize and implement a scheme of world government. The CFR opines that the current structure of multilateral institutions provide an inadequate foundation on which to implement their agenda of international governance.¹

The report’s thesis is merely a larger extrapolation of the philosophy espoused by President Obama’s Chief of Staff, Rahm Emmanuel:

“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste…It’s an opportunity to do things you could not do before.”

Rahm Emanuel
Wall Street Journal CEO Council
Washington, D.C.
Nov. 19th, 2008

The CFR report outlines four areas, which by their estimation present a window of opportunity to implement and expand mechanisms of global governance. These areas should come as no surprise as they are the same crisis/government provided solution talking points exaggerated prior to the debt recession taking center stage.

• International Response to the “Global War on Terror”
• International Protection of the Environment/Energy Security
• International Management of the Global Economy
• Supporting the doctrine of Preemptive War

Full CFR Report (151kb) Click icon to open or “right-click” and select “Save Link As…” to save PDF locally.

The report goes on to say that one possible implementation likely to work would be a formal international organization allowing for universal membership such as the United Nations coupled along with regional or sub-regional organizations as we see with the African/European Unions, G8, NATO, etcetera. Moreover, the CFR suggests incorporating Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO’s) as well as “super-empowered individuals”, ergo Bono in order to sell the idea successfully to the public.

The Council on Foreign Relations rationalizes the need for the creation of an international government due to their flawed assessment that no single country, can address these issues on their own with out multilateral assistance. Therefore, we see yet again that the answers provided are merely a response to problems wholly created by multinational oligarchs in the first place. Whether it is the economic collapse at the hands of the world’s central bankers or the chess game of international antagonism at the behest of the United Nations, which more often than not results in the outbreak of war, the CFR seeks to implement the tired shell game of government created problem supplanted with an international governmental solution.

However, most alarming to this blogger, is the report’s outright hostility to national sovereignty and disdain for our Republic’s Constitution. Most specifically is the reports blatant objection to our Constitutional separation of power, stating:

The report continues its degradation of Constitutional principles:

“Second, the country’s longstanding tradition of liberal “exceptionalism” inspires U.S. vigilance in protecting the domestic sovereignty and institutions from the perceived incursions of international bodies. Finally, the separation of powers enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress a critical voice in the ratification of treaties and endorsement of global institutions, complicates U.S. assumptions of new international obligations.”

Council on Foreign Relations
“International Institutions and Global Governance”
‘A New Era of American Leadership?’
Page 4

Needless to say, while corporate old-media routinely sought to discredit anyone who dared mention the CFR, painting them as “conspiracy theorists” or kooks, the CFR report arrogantly acknowledges that the false left/right paradigm is inconsequential in obtaining its goals. It is most assuredly that their assumption stated in the report and issued six-months prior to this fall’s past election is based upon the fact that members of the CFR were interwoven in the campaigns of both major-party nominees. As a result and as recently documented, President Obama’s administration is infested throughout with members of this traitorous organization² among whom are as follows:

• Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton
• Deputy Secretary of State, James Steinberg
• State Department Special Envoy, Henry Kissenger
• State Department Special Envoy, Richard C. Holbroke
• State Department Special Envoy, Richard Haas
• Director of National Intelligence, Admiral Dennis Blair
• National Security Advisor, General James Jones
• Deputy National Security Advisor, Thomas Donilon
• Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates
• Chairman of Economic Recovery Committee, Paul Volker
• Presidential Advisor, Alan Greenspan

Fellow readers, the Council on Foreign Relations is by my estimation in the final act of their bloodless coup to pull the curtains down upon the American Republic. It is so candidly plain that through their infestation of our government, they are but the termites of the new class of would be divine rulers who have all but eaten the entire substance of our Constitution. It is obvious by reading this document, which I implore you to do so for your own benefit, that it is their perverse desire to build a fascist regime of regional corporatocracy under a supreme international parliament, whereby inherent liberties, individual sovereignty be damned.

Quite honestly, the report is frightening yet illuminating simultaneously. Whereas they plainly state in black and white:

“The harder chore is to persuade the relevant parties to adopt a new way of doing business, including (in some cases) the loss of current privileges. For this reason, CFR will include in any proposed recommendations a practical strategy to win multilateral support for needed changes, as well as forging domestic consensus among the major U.S. stakeholders.”

Council on Foreign Relations
“International Institutions and Global Governance”
‘A New Era of American Leadership?’
Page 5

Yet their new gloves off approach offers us hope. The Patriotic remnant who have watched this ferment over the last decade, receive absolute vindication from the dismissive mocking of those scandalous cretins who sought to discredit any such pronouncement regarding their corrupt prerogatives. The unfettered arrogance as displayed in this report might well be nailed from every utility post in every town in order to share and make plain their high treason to the American Republic. It is now immaterial that many of our fellow Americans, out of either willful ignorance or a premeditated philosophy of perpetual denial chose to dismiss claims of an ulterior motive based upon the promise of peace and prosperity via globalism.

We stand now my fellow patriots at a most important fork in the road regarding our Republic. We must indeed choose carefully. Whether we wish to reclaim and expand the rugged individualist spirit, which made our nation the envy of the world, or if the fear wrought by the boogie man of terrorism and economic malaise that keeps many of us awake, will lead us to seek hollow salvation through central planning at a cost of enormous individual liberty.

In conclusion, may the wisdom of the Founding Generation provide a lantern to guide us in recognizing and remembering wholeheartedly the absolute righteousness of the preservation of individual liberty.

“The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable — and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come!

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, “Peace! Peace!” — but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!“

Patrick Henry
March 23, 1775

Source(s): ¹Council on Foreign Relations: International Institutions and Global Governance Program: World Order in the 21st Century, Published May 8, 2008 • ²“The Obama Deception” 00:40:42 – 00:42:22

Russell Means

(Original Video Blog) As we all sit awestruck in front of the television, the computer, or the newspaper, Mr. Means offers us a solution to the current Global calamity. In his own beautifully articulated words, Mr. Means, explains both how the World got into this mess and how we can move back towards sanity and wholeness. We must, as he says, return to Matriarchy, a balance, respectful way of life where we celebrate our differences, rather than stifle, or even, destroy them.