Wire Report
(NoThirdSolution: David Zemens) – For many people (and yes I’m jumping to conclusions and making sweeping generalizations here) “No one should die because they can’t afford health care” is the weasel way of saying “I want someone else to pay for it” without sounding like a panhandler. So, take what follows with a grain of salt, OK?
On that note, someone’s Facebook status said:
“No one should die because they cannot afford health care, and no one should go broke because they get sick. If you agree, please post this as your status for the rest of the day.”
No one should die just because they were born in sub-Saharan Africa, either. But they do. Doesn’t make it fair, but it happens. For every “poor” or underprivileged Westerner complaining about their lack of “health care” (NB: even the poorest Americans have access to better health care than, I would venture to guess, 85% of the earth’s population has ever had), there are a million people living on $1 and a cup of rice each day — so cry me a river.
Every one of us will die at the crossroads of some particular circumstances, time, and place:
- Some of us die in our sleep. Some of us are merely in “the wrong place at the wrong time”.
- Some of us will die because the technology to cure what ails us has not yet been invented.
- Some of us will die because we made poor choices that presently impact our ability to care for ourselves, and
- some of us will die unfortunately through no direct fault of our own, because we can’t afford to pay for the technology that does exist.
To lament the fact that some people die under seemingly inopportune circumstances is folly; it ignores the lion’s share of the equation. Financial circumstances are a scapegoat, because at nearly any time and place where the individual isn’t DOA, a change in financial circumstances might forestall death for a few hours, days, weeks, or months.
You’ll get no arguments from me, if you say that “health care is too expensive”: blame the AMA cartel, the FDA, blame “Big Insurance”, etc. But national health care is health care fascism; the insurers want guaranteed profits, guaranteed customers for life, and Uncle Sam to pay the bills. They want to sell you your own welfare.
You’ll get no arguments from me, if you say that “the system” needs to be reformed: specifically it needs to not be a system at all. People aren’t permitted under the law to care for themselves or to arrange for the care of others. Or because the consumer is not the customer, and the customer enjoys certain tax privileges that the consumer does not, etc. Or because people have been conditioned to believe that “insurance” should pay for an annual check-up and dental exams and all sorts of other routine maintenance instead of just providing for accidents and serious illnesses.
The problem is that health care, medicine, long-term care, etc., is damned expensive. Government is the problem in health care, which keeps it unaffordable.
Asking or forcing others to pay the costs, which you can’t afford, will do nothing to actually solve that problem; it just shifts the burden, messing up someone else’s life circumstances, exacerbating the problem for the future.
About the Author: David Zemens
|
 |
David Zemens is the Editor & Publisher of No Third Solution, and holds a Bachelor’s degree in Business and a Master’s degree in Economics. A self-taught libertarian, David has recently begun delving in to “agorism” a political philosophy developed by Samuel Edward Konkin III, which aims for a society built on voluntary associations and exchange, thereby resulting in a true free market. He considers one-day subverting state propaganda completely by opting to teach at the local community college.
David currently works as a market-research analyst and he and his wire were happily married in September of 2008.
|
In this week’s Texas Straight Talk, Dr. Ron Paul discusses the reality of how through the government management of health care, medical costs will only continue to escalate. He also discusses the misnomer of health care being right seeing that the government must first employ force to offer the service to another. Pointing to that health insurance was originally intended to be used in case of serious injury or disease and not routine doctor visits and other non-emergency situations. He continues by posing the hypothetical question, “What if vehicle insurance covered not only major accidents but all routine maintenance and expenses such as gasoline. Stating that with no market force to measure to balance supply and demand the cost of gasoline would skyrocket in as more and more individuals began to rely on their automobile policy to cover the expense rather than budgeting for the necessary consumption thereof.
