President-Elect Obama’s Definition of “Change” looks alot like the Clinton White House
November 24, 2008 at 11:23 am
by: Allison Bricker 
“Change” was the cornerstone of President-Elect Obama’s campaign. Often spoken and vaguely defined, his hypnotic lip service to a nation weary of the “Bush Years” was enough to sweep him from the well of the Senate straight into the White House. The problem here is that as the days since the election become weeks, the individuals President-Elect Obama is selecting to fill out his staff and cabinet are more of the same old career politicians who have spent their lives sucking from the public trough. As the chart below illustrates, these are the same scoundrels which through their love of central nanny state planning, helped ensure the current economic crisis and erosion of inherent liberties.
This list reads like a veritable “Who’s Who” of beltway Washington Aristocrats, and these are just the sourced appointments to the Obama White House. Unconfirmed reports are also circulating that James Steinberg former Clinton Administration deputy national security adviser is on the short list to be President-Elect Obama’s choice for National Security Adviser.1 How is someone to believe that President Elect Obama will help fix an imploding economy and divided nation when the same people who helped cause the mess are elevated yet again to positions of power?
The answer of course is that they will not. Moreover, a closer inspection of these filthy power hungry individuals yields even less hope for rolling back the massive unconstitutional powers decreed to the Executive Branch under President Bush. The truth is, the face of the puppet may have changed from bumbling dote to articulate persuasive figurehead, but outside of that it is business as usual.
If we look at the public statements and actions of those listed above, we see that their motivation comes solely from attaining more for themselves while throwing scraps to “we the people”. Eric Holder, who is on pace to be the next Attorney General for example, said in a 1999 interview:
“The court has really struck down every government effort to try to regulate it. We tried with regard to pornography. It is gonna be a difficult thing, but it seems to me that if we can come up with reasonable restrictions, reasonable regulations in how people interact on the Internet, that is something that the Supreme Court and the courts ought to favorably look at.”2
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
As we reported weeks ago, it is almost a certainty that an Obama Administration will seek to end the free flow of ideas exchanged across the internet vis-a-vi the “Fairness Doctrine 2.0″. Do we as Americans need the government to tell us what is “reasonable” or”safe” to listen to, read, or view? The Founders knew that allowing government to dictate what was “reasonable” was guaranteed to lead to one thing and one thing only, censorship.
Further complimenting President-Elect Obama’s socialist plans for our healthcare industry, are his picks for Chief of Staff and Secretary of State, Rahm Emanuel and Hilary Clinton respectively. Both were lead architects of the failed “Hilary Care” during the Clinton Administration.3 Rahm Emanuel as we reported is also the architect and ferverent supporter of forced unpaid labor via his “Compulsory Civil Service” program. Between Hillary Clinton and Rahm Emanuel they have received over $15.9 million in campaign contributions from healthcare industries, central bankers, criminal financiers, and bailout recipients.4 Care to guess which healthcare companies/individuals will receive government certification to administer and oversee the universal healthcare program?
Next, continuing President-Elect Obama’s perverse definition of “change” is his choice for Secretary of the Treasury, Timothy Geithner. Mr. Geithner is currently the President of the New York branch of the Federal Reserve. This guarantees that an Obama Administration will continue this debt based fiat currency system that is to the sole benefit of the private Central Bankers who own the Federal Reserve. The obvious conflict of interest in having a Federal Reserve branch President in charge of the U.S. Treasury, relying on his fellow Federal Reserve Central Bankers to loan the government money via Reserve Notes, should go without saying, and most likely will thanks to a mainstream media intoxicated by President-Elect Obama.
Additionally, many of us would love to be a fly on the wall during the times when Lawrence Summers, former Secretary of the Treasury under the Clinton Administration and Hillary Clinton are in the same room. It would be most interesting to see how Hillary Clinton interacts with Mr. Summers, the former President of Harvard who resigned in disgrace in 2006 after remarking that “issues of intrinsic aptitude” could explain underrepresentation of women in the fields of science and engineering.5 Nice to know “Change” in Obama’s mind means appointing a misogynist who feels women are just too stupid in comparison to men.
In conclusion, during the next four years we will see campaign promises fall by the way side, massive government programs designed to fix the last batch of failed government programs, central planning and intervention into our economy which will exacerbate and prolong the coming depression; while benefiting central bankers, as well as a further shredding and trampling of our liberties and Constitution.
It is my opinion, President-Elect Obama’s definition of “Change” reeks of 1984 “doublespeak”.
Source(s): 1Business Day - “Contenders for Key Posts in New Cabinet” • 2 May 28, 1999 NPR Morning Edition • 3 Slate - “Obama’s Muscle” • 4 OpenSecrets.org - Hillary Clinton Record/Rahm Emanuel Record • 5 The Economic Times - “Lawrence Summer to become Obama’s Top Economic Adviser”































November 24th, 2008 at 11:45 am
Hello.
I would like to put a link to your site on my blog roll if you want to do the same for mine. It would be a good way to build up both of our readerships.
thank you.
November 24th, 2008 at 4:03 pm
I think if this “economic crisis” had not hit, Obama would have been more inclined to pick “Changers”. I think he feels like he needs some DC insiders to get things moving on the financial front the minute he gets to office. Maybe he feels that having rookies in the power positions would prevent him from moving quickly. I’m still hopeful that the guy at the top will make a difference. He’s smart and has smart advisors, other than the ones you mentioned, around him.
On the free speech/indecency/fcc front. I actually wrote to Senator Obama a couple of years ago regarding indecency when everyone was throwing a fit over the Superbowl breast exposure etc. I am hopeful that the Obama administration will not spend time policing our language or trying to figure out what is indecent and what is not. He has stated numerous times that parents need to pay attention to what their kids are watching and doing on the internet. Hopefully that will mark the extent of any policy that gets into free speech. The current Republican FCC and administration totally went against the idea of small laissez faire government in terms of free speech. They pandered to groups like the “Parents Television Council” which is a group of wackos who write complaints to the FCC as a group and then as a result get tv and radio stations and networks fined. It’s ridiculous.
Let’s give this guy a shot. I think he’ll be able to keep the former Clintonites in check. We’ll see.
July 2nd, 2009 at 1:29 pm
Hillary wouldn’t mind that statement, she knows she has to become an honorary man to become a high level occultist in the order of the eastern star and attend all male cult gatherings like the Bohemian Grove
She’s a 6th degree grand dame in the female branch of co-masonry